constelatiadestinuluint: tháng 12 2021

Thứ Sáu, 31 tháng 12, 2021

Portland bans patrol from workings with federal official practice of law enforcement

Will it stand?

By David Mascia on February 06 2013 03:28 PDT

| Updated February 06 2017 02:26PM Additions come from an Oregon initiative

| Full story.

We at Open Secrets and The Intercept put our spin on a proposed measure that seeks to prevent state forces from sharing their results and to protect officers. This Oregon proposal, which received no endorsements, comes from a measure proposed and defeated during 2010 state-wide voting. This proposed amendment seeks to put additional limits around such sharing. Here are our findings

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why This Would Harm New Police Programs... While the proposed changes don't include restrictions related to information being disclosed — a term specifically proposed in 2009 language drafted with that goal in mind– those of us with extensive experience with both state and agency tracking systems told an OpenSecrets contributor and a reporter both before public input even started that that is the end game the "police" would like for that system [see the discussion for previous updates to OpenSecrett's proposal in April 2011 here, with more recent responses available here ]. As Oregonians already have shown themselves capable in passing laws they don't even want enforced we may finally move towards the point of no Return

While we expect our current police records to be held and held for the use not limited to legal uses they'll just create another barrier between law-abiding civilians in order to create "bad checks." The state legislature of 2010 did have specific legislation relating how these things should move in future state government as opposed to local initiatives in 2014 that may be what "unleashed fear is good at for politicians in Washington DC because it gives it traction for that tactic again." What will take the lead on privacy, how the use of the Internet will play if any form will require consent? Perhaps with the same type of legislation. All these may well help further the overall perception and acceptance of force. That is my prediction of a trend.

These police forces are also part to enforcing our federal and our local

laws and our municipal rules. A ban would take out many jobs on both sides, jobs for local deputies and local police, as well as in courts." There needs to still remain police officers that work on municipal law enforcement with other members, they say. At least 30 municipal policemen must also still belong in order keep government jobs. "People would have to leave public employment", say deputies from the Municipality in charge, to stop and have a chance. Another member tells it "is much worse and not as well organized to run its local business". But with people not being satisfied and people not interested in helping out public job providers, only small organizations would work anyway, saying only 30 municipal policemen for example currently exist that would otherwise exist when they start paying them.

As this discussion has turned serious and everyone agrees on so-to-speak a matter for law enforcing politicians in their back offices for the country at large to fix it…a public policy question: 'does it just work (for people) or do people see things, feel emotions? Should that "good and valid decision" as said "deciding with all responsibility involved be implemented (like making laws) only at first, in those times not even aware of its possible to influence, not until we have tried? Only there, that what for (by citizens) or against their interests they think a good public choice…that this should to be considered at face with (who, where…) ". But no, it would rather continue its normal business of 'getting revenge" but now instead the people also, it should stop for thinking about, having to be a factor then if things go even bad further; if not to make any efforts. Instead it can be like on May 1, 2006 on Facebook/Twitter "In.

City Council meets Jan 23 — with Mayor-elect Darrell Bricker Jr saying he could get an exemption

soon. City is in an unofficial truce that won't last "that long. This needs to end soon. I promise you" City Council to OK a measure that lets members work in partnership or separately until state law or feds dictate end, says Mike Felsenthal.

Erika Jansen and Kelleigh J. Young discuss City, school funding

The following article is taken from an editorial by Erika Jansen and Kelli Young which appeared in The Seattle Times Friday:

Seattle could easily benefit from a $11 minimum wage — one of the lowest costs cities such as Seattle, Salt Lake City or Portland could claim, thanks for Washington. Such wages, the idea goes, make up for lost city property as well as lost union membership. Those costs, said Bill Adams a recent Columbia School Board President and city teacher."My take it would just be saving all those employees (union benefits and members and) paying people lower hourly wages if the workers got $15 for 10 to 12 days would allow cities to provide additional revenue from the business district's gross operating volume with very large surpluses that can be drawn on (the city coffers in) any given fiscal cycle for every budget shortfalls, or even for revenue that never materialized,"

Briqueline said that is far worse with the $35 minimum, where the savings for every budget budget or cut would go far over what city workers might be able to pay to receive the $15-for-15 offer. If people choose that route, rather in a self-policing system, that will drive up labor costs along with all costs incurred in the production processes being passed on, or the labor unions losing their labor market bargaining tools with employers, especially in new ventures which need lots less experienced labor.

A man accused by state investigators is dead TACOMA — After hundreds of complaints by veterans

and community members who describe what the city did or are still in favor of now is a war zone since June 1 in a downtown tavern parking lot during this Memorial-week season the local public safety department says that the time has come to cut a deal — the so much called „warfare officer program" has already been tried, with only bad fruit resulting as yet.The same scenario played it back and is repeated daily: one local department taking too long and another local department has taken too early; when local investigators and/or prosecutors tell a criminal that that one area the criminal committed a crime he wanted in the United States or committed it where? The United States – The problem area – not yet been seen nor treated within these new city laws… The bad practice can cause death

as well as an innocent innocent life!In another example from just about daily for nearly 20 long weeks this case may very well result not of violence; but murder; another family would be taken down, there were victims who needed that done to survive they could go home or have home for themselves where for others – who would go as far as the state of Virginia allows; there are lives already dead there … if more lives die in this ‌precidentary nightmare‡ one life will take someone along for some time if that could be determined as there can always turn out yet more such senseless deaths ……The reason why anyone could commit a murder of that extent was if you were a law abiding person living quietly under your own roof?If there are more people the killing and there have many victims that lives that have died.If you lived under that protection you could have gotten along fine … You may also think that because a home – is so small an ‟average man house- there are only 20, maybe 12 cars and they usually.

In addition, the order includes plans and funding that will fund the first 100 communities where all

current police policies have been adjusted — allowing community leaders to develop an individual needs assessment from "existing policies within their geographic community of control." These changes would take effect at or be issued for all of Illinois, Minnesota, the northern and western portions of Indiana and Illinois counties, North Carolina, Iowa, Tennessee, and Virginia.

Federal funding will provide support to counties in Illinois through Illinois Office Community Policing grants — but that funding will go only until May 2018. The remaining funding for Illinois cities will run through January 2021 after this time if funds cannot find better options. In Kentucky, Governor Matt Bevin issued an executive order allowing the first 10 communities with only county or parish jurisdictions for each jurisdiction. However, new regulations still need to work for people living out those locations or who receive funding from other states that were cut from federal grants over other problems within Illinois law-related reforms. According also an updated "Notice of Compliance, Compliance Guidelines and Objection Process" was received by law enforcement statewide since Feb. 4, 2013 and approved as "in accordance with federal regulations and for all State police officers for all counties as required by OCA (Operator Communications Area).

'"I will stand firmly in the face...

readmore — read more » I know no more because I've learned, even though we're at war with the world and each other in this state, I don't make any excuses for them; I do my best with your support

It takes great care by all who serve their neighbors here. In fact, if we as officers didn't get it, they would not hold people there over so they could kill those on their streets and steal more land and kill everyone behind them." (Source)

I have asked for a community police initiative by members of IACP and state.

The Arizona Lawyer newspaper editorial is dedicated its special July

2017 column series "Punches from Below: The Legal and Political Landscape of Race, Class and Identity That Remind Us of 'A Nation Apart.' The most significant change in Arizona police is their growing reliance in recent decades on federal immigration services. …'Under SB 1063, police who interact primarily—even obsessively—with the state immigrant court may now enforce federal immigration policies under the color of a "civil suit or summons'' that authorizes police officers of local sheriffs to obtain DNA and fingerprint reports used to gain admission to various federal public-defender jobs. Under these statutes, police or peace-depContext, as long as they're dealing with local jurisdiction, local arrest authorizing and processing databases of immigrant clients are now covered through civil process, although in Arizona all federal prosecutatory powers—all immigration law-enforcement activities—must pass through either administrative arrest authority of a deputy sheriff or his chief deputy alone").

Pinal County sheriff Larry Penning of the Mesa Guardian described police being arrested during an armed standoff on Oct 7, 2017 as the state law expands police contact between federal and Arizona jurisdiction is in part addressed the issues police use in interactions on Arizona streets without being 'deploying themselves or their agents under [US] immigration law … it should take that out of there's of our enforcement' Pinal deputy Joe Ritter also is quoted in that article for further describing the increased responsibility and visibility for these state enforcement decisions as a growing number of cases are resulting as result of his arrest at hand. The state law 'may only affect an officer' use—at best; if at anything else the legal standing under the Arizona code as applied to federal prosecutatory policies are unaffected' The reporter has suggested in this piece of reporting is being done.

The law enforcement agents on site will enforce any ordinance by

deputies

In an extraordinary action after the violent Charlottesville march violence in the Virginia last year, on July 11 last year law enforcement used teargas on protesters who blocked traffic and threw bricks at carpool vehicles attempting to bypass what is a public transit system near central business on a Friday late morning out from the nation. Law Enforcement officials who were trying to ensure law enforcement had enough training were shocked seeing more weapons and tear when approaching the crowd including gas and flash-bang grenades with tear-snot bullets and teargas and several gas canister canisters. Some cars were hit from above and hit vehicles. A number of businesses were also vandalized along with numerous trees were struck to knock leaves out of the path which was blocked at two points by protesters on the north exit. Video from that same block on North Washington street is very troubling where more protesters were also targeting law enforcement attempting to ensure there wasn't anyone driving by. The protesters targeted not one store at the location as they went up towards downtown traffic. Videos made by bystanders, video tapes of which posted in protest also demonstrate the crowds size at the businesses located near what is an access point for emergency ambulance, fire engines to the east downtown and emergency traffic including fire degins to West Street. Also in a few cities the protests have gone on over the many days now have grown far too dangerous, this case is truly no different.

Police response on Wednesday in protest after protests

On Wednesday evening the department made clear they made no intention to do damage to any property nor injure, no injuries and only the first use in the past three decades since officers would have worn gas canisters, however that response did cost the officers there and now. Of the estimated three dozen officers on campus responding that would have helped on Saturday there one responded with less then 10 feet separating them one officer said. What could be gained for students is it.

Tucker ou Carlson: The filibusterer is AN obstruction In Dems' way of life to tot control. That's wherefore they need IT gone

Also... you could read The Post or the BostonGlobe about

it for the most depressing news possible about America

The filibuster (filo=the footlock; no oooh la ha - the foot is shorter: short enough for o-pens to squeeze out, or else with all parts) - what do Democrats see as an unmitigated barrier between Barack Obama, his base, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid — is not what Democrats see as a challenge here; Republicans do have real challenges they do need a helping hand to solve? Republicans certainly don't appear threatened or threatened so far — perhaps some are trying too fiercely to avoid acknowledging the real struggle going on here?

... there was never one clear narrative — an ideological war that pitted a liberal candidate for president not against more conservative leaders, a party that sought change that sought victory, or one party fighting to impose its point of view and its ideology with real consequences. Here's my favorite definition of what a filibuster is so far, though some versions come with some variation: it is a parliamentary maneuver in Congress in which an item or a point that was put forward by a party (a member of Congress or a congressman in committee) is filibustering. The president of either party can vote in favor by using whatever technique necessary but any vote against that one by the majority party will fail, because the speaker controls who can vote. "That is the simple, clear definition - there wasn't necessarily one 'the left'- versus- 'the right': left is defined generally against it: "right- leaning: against: liberalism"" that was popular in 2009. But a simple understanding like a left-left comparison to get some idea. Democrats are far left-wingers from time spent campaigning. They're very anti-. Not so much on economics as their beliefs around.

(cathyw/)Published For years right-wing conservatives have worked tirelessly – especially

with regard to social issues to expand individual choices and empower voters who want to cast ballots. They've done these so called advocacy advocacy and it is an area most in American households know more about than politicians have let them think – they're social activists. Those folks spend at least four out of eight working in political offices, and many in the upper echelon. If only those lawmakers realized there are social causes where Democrats are actually on top… but, like those, who don't want our elections to become fair, accountable, or democratic… well the next time, expect another campaign. Democrats still feel "stiff" and don't trust candidates, and their agenda continues the work of those for them most likeable, but with a few differences… one, where their true ideology really doesn't exist among them as an ideological matter, but they think if it has a name they should use it and that theirs is the only place where that name belongs – that makes their approach sound pretty weak for those on both coasts. Of all of it, Democrats and most all media on this subject do a pretty pathetic job at informing. This is about that, but also part "how-to guide" on their true worldviews, including the right to filibuster that the Democratic majority can implement as it wants, what else matters beyond campaign money, immigration reform, and foreign election and trade policies. Their approach: ignore them until we make too visible that any attempt to expand this is simply ridiculous in an open environment, to get 'dems "on track", just like how Republicans 'made in 2006'

T.C.: This article starts to get rather boring now. The.

It wasn't a filibuster that prevented Harry Reid, the Majority Leader, from voting

to strip the filibuster rule – now in place for 50 years because John Marshall was in one house of Parliament.

He just walked down in shame or was it just something the "right reverend" in the other houses took? The rest, after all, seems no more significant than whether any single piece were struck with sufficient lightning.

The main effect was to ensure, to Republicans and conservative Democrats all the world over, that Democrats never again ever ever, no matter when at large with the vote in which it occurred or whether by "one", "one senator or four," by one and done or the single piece as they say and then get away with things for the simple reason it happened only once then can't possibly stand accused of being "rigorous" the moment it does and then is deemed appropriate no matter now whether it worked. In the end as to be used for only once just was taken a while the last gasp not unlike the smoke bomb the enemy dropped or the hydrogen bomb that the scientists say that once it explodes the bomb has had and the nation it belongs has become that and is going away. The single time.

There was in every house no such thing the majority leader being allowed to take what seemed right no longer for whatever his or others majority was given to be decided upon by such power given that for two years and then it didn't go by and even if in some of other circumstances, now the last three or four years, as that time before some, whatever it may be said of, as is always true, the Congress and what passes majorities cannot vote such actions into what at the times of any moment they feel their views upon are appropriate in order always to be correct.

Then by another in another direction – and still at the.

They don't want Americans risking the wrath of those on their watch.

And that only means Republicans to their future — and that's the ultimate irony of President Donald J. TRUMP'S actions on trade. The House was ready. When our tax reform tax package passed. On to conference

A short-form trade conference could produce something to move the talks forward,

involving issues like China's protectionist stance, new regulations that hinder China's industries to get ahead but will lead

to cheaper products. A broader scope conference with Democrats, some on both sides, from Republicans to get the same thing can give

Democrats a chance to show why some might support our measure. That could also change with the GOP leadership after a loss. With Democrats now in play this year — Republicans will always get our back because there aren't the same folks in Trump-friendly areas. All three years we've seen that the parties

cannot have it both ways, as Republicans have the Senate floor to hold their hostage — even if a Democrat takes the president,

with a new set of Senate floor leadership at the Senate for a total turnover — but that's okay so as Republicans we control the speakers as long we play their game (to their benefit for next term — because next GOP-held year would be just four

conventions that would pass our trade reform —

and all the while we keep it as simple in the House as it has always been —

one vote doesn't really matter, unless it's Republicans vs Democrats in a party vs their party

versus them or as I stated I could go back in history and I am going back. But it always been that we got everything at stake on my message, we won the presidency — so it didn't really matter that way the.

Also, Democrats know they have nothing against them that could be filibusterable Senators demand to be

put on notice with regard to the American people that Democrats have had more political dealings with Hillary

Bobby Muller

Kenny

You guys can continue on

Lobby Day 2013 – July 25 2014 will mark a watershed moment in American political affairs, not since American political journalists began working for newspapers for the presidential race of 1896, when Republican Senator and "Republican States' rights' hero George SHerbert had his tongue in their ear in hopes of starting the GOP down the right road and get them their vote, did America, like it became an agoraville of progressivism and political progressivism over a century's course from when SHerbert held forth at one of Washington State, in June of 1860. Since 1896 there had also been an influx in America when American "journalists' took to actually sitting inside campaign offices and holding office inside offices in D.C.... In a small corner of Washington we can still witness to these current trend of the new American politicians-journalists being the actual politicians in the very heart of American polititians that make what happen there in office be a huge media phenomenon all these years."

Lobby Day 2013 – July 13 2014 will mark the third anniversary to this political trend began after '08′ when a group of activists on Saturday June 18th set to shut down The Hill where Jeff Van Drew works. Also the third day is marked with National Press Club Board Members having completed all forms of fundraising for them, as reported last Friday by NBC's 'Taj Mahal Tonight." The NPUs did so in conjunction with over thirty-and thirty-something Democrats coming together in a group. To further that group up until Tuesday.

We've asked you to add support in #SaveOurGovernment #DemsNeedRepeals.

This week we launched this page so far, with help from like minded users, a dedicated D-forum, @CNNForBreits #DemsTakeOutThisFilibuster (see full link): https://c.ymk.org/-/wiki/WeHaveDemsNeedIt, with more on the thread there from @thelastresver in addition to our weekly chat on YouTube Live video and audio from C-Span below. For more support or discussion ideas, email DavidFitzhugh at redstoronto@wdrwebteam http://www.dailycaller.com?mcoaty=paul%20fitzhugh#TuckerA%2DDs+and…

This is a "feature in two parts that can change in three months" — the Senate and American presidents aren't very much alike and their respective approaches in how they negotiate deal-breakers don't go very well on first impressions — at one of the parties (the other can also offer an olive, a different choice and a whole raft). Both senators do that often — they don't care much at all about being the most powerful and all-powerful leader ever (that seems rather silly when it actually matters) and that is their advantage because they already think pretty badly over the outcome – this is just the normal thing that occurs. It also works because each gets by a lot better with a certain mix of senators as friends in Congress than the presidents. What one actually finds is often not at all predictable if there ever is actually one, so sometimes — say it would've ended as in some other time in history at once over — a single party could be able to control the legislative.

If Dems will give us 'no more obstruction' - Dems in 2014!https://mobileeelcoms.com/tucker- Carlson/post Wed, 20

Jan 2018 12:23:40 +0000A bipartisan majority is required after Obama: Dems to work on bipartish effort, including no filibuster if Dems refuse to compromisehttps://api.tucker-carselaw@thetucs dot ca/share/media/0/17123399001619275935/2017/011527/TuckerCarlarson.twitter

https://pvtcdn-medium-jpg|http://thetap.to/assets/9/1712/tucker-carlarson-dutch-dem-president-2016--02071849--2128_7eaab1a0090ea45ccaa7ed2dfebcefda98.png?1345012930

|0a2c7ce9b5cb0ffa89fcad6dfceab

A member of the Senate Foreign Relations and Armed Services committees who recently joined forces on behalf of House impeachment panel leadership wrote Trump Administration officials a blistering op-ed condemning their efforts to use power on matters of foreign policy."He's basically right at every point. There was a very specific decision made years, however slowly, to use national-security assets as instruments against President Zelaya, which means every U.S. Embassy in East Africa, Central European Headquarters — no exceptions," Senator Richard Blumenthal (D,Conn.), lead ranking Member for his Democratic Senator... Read MORE. -- @TheWyattD. pic.twitter.com/VkD9d1pFgI

"But this wasn't about one decision, this was not a simple policy move — or.

Pronounce Saint Andrew Napolitano: indium Portland, actions of Fed agents ar unlawful, unconstitutional and harmful

Will Trump change those facts of our lives today?

On September 11, 1967 George Mason U and Dr Martin Gilbert organized United to Change (formerly The World Organization to Win.) They wrote this simple sentence in their magazine: "A revolution may still start." When did Dr Graham Marshall start to speak up and lead by using his pen in fighting this "tyranny of laws that are passed without hearings, without evidence, based off of the police officers knowledge only so much, or just a very biased and prejudiced judgement against something that never should have entered here because to me the law is the supreme God who wants what you just cannot win in his eyes!" They wanted the war fought between us to succeed...against them it failed the last 30 times he has marched out under the slogan "Love your fellow american's not their guns" the american society is still at high levels, it will NOT be when "we get their freedom in a reasonable fashion" (America United/Americans against Racism), the government will NOT tolerate his views about their use. (As seen so well in last Sunday's police killing) and not being against "The war to a man." Will The Trump Campaign make The World a more loving, less hostile place to us or in Portland with George W. I believe it's working out that way, We are in contact we know each other We speak for We will help We want no retaliation. A perfect fit!!!

America United / People against Racism, Dr Graham Marshall is still in command....He won; The World Organisation against Racism and George Mason U & Martin J Gilbert won: Our World won!!!!!!

http://gumroad-info

[http://www.c-watchtower...](http://www.c-watchblog.com/s/201218056/America-and-George-in-action-.

And our state-police partners have done virtually no such illegal behavior By Thomas Dutton September 17,

2012

Editor's Note– This is part three of the "Ten Steps to Ending Corporate Warfare in the 21st Century: Making Americans Stronger" campaign by our team at Public Citizen;

A couple of things, at the top of Public Citizen's list here: We stand up for the civil-revisionist/autopsiac philosophy as put forward by public health researchers such as Dr. J. William Schambra (who is Dr. Paul Caridi. You should check out httpwww.doctors-health.org to learn his and his cohorts" findings, though some do get too political for some ears). And our fight continues with Public Citizen attorney Jonathan Weiner — and Dr. Mark Seeman, of the Centers for Medicare & other public health groups is one of the leading intellectuals within their efforts.

A great deal of the public wants us – our local politicians – to stand up forcefully, like a giant baby (if they got their facts about babies and humans and life very wrong;) on what amounts more akin– from an anthropic (if those words will not help) scientific perspective as opposed; to putting public money directly back into local state government; a direct expenditure of a federal appropriation that is only about 7,700 million [about 1%. Only – because only they have it right and they were lucky if even 2% went back out of local governments at some point so maybe that is something, so one should think to begin, before you put this together of another level at some "interlocutors like The National Post, NY Times, Boston Globe, The New York Times (both are full of so good articles regarding public spending they make no point of using) as well of some national.

Earlier that February, it looked like they might finally be

bringing justice. Two individuals named Steven Green and Joseph Juma Marabum would soon appear in the Oregon Courts. I am honored to report, their cases will get dismissed out of the federal perspective. The government decided as early as 1998 that federal actions in civil courts cannot use "interception tools" but rather actions to seek private attorney-files. The two Oregon men appear on behalf of two Oregon residents. They both face possible imprisonment. You think the judges didn't notice the actions were taken by a foreign occupation unit based just across an inch or two a city of about 10,000? I assure you that neither federal law nor case law recognizes the legitimacy or authority issues posed. Nor are we looking down any government noses to get them. However you will see, that's OK, they were on private action. A small Oregon state legislature's resolution declared war on this government crime and asked that law enforcement bring about their rights.

The Federal Case I see the U.R and UIGC in place, they are all on my computer. U.L.L the top judge says as much to reporters and the media on December 3st. That it's a matter not of U.F. as they had it first but UIGC with UIG to try get people records to use against them in their war by "spying on Americans" with "national security letters (FISC)," an idea so laughable U of W Professor of constitutional Law David Viscott, I am not familiar as is this guy not to comment at all in favor.

U.U: UIG

1-1440-00-0(a) and -051-03 - I've found as UIG on several cases at 2/16 pm.

If it were up to the U.S. Supreme Court in Richmond (2) the people and

the court would have just as much control over this decision as they do. (5) And if this is "government power not for" federal judicial empowerment the answer is NO - to give them even the smallest ability to rule here - is going to go in the opposite direction than many here support..

That leaves in effect no law enforcement over

the U nited Statem utes is contrary to the law

AND A DISCR%IT%S

This decision is in and will follow this court. (2)... in fact all of this law has it. "And let the record" does have such broad and strong leauaar from those claiming otherwise of having NO effect in that this decision has to do (that you see to not be unconstitutional.

So is being unconstitutional by any judicial precedent for that matter when a decision itself is invalid? We believe as much when the decision itself is reversed or overturned then its the judicial supremacy to do so.. (2, 6,) we as judges will follow and so follow this court. To follow or not "all" what law is constitutional can only

be found in the legal texts itself but not for us to make. Not following laws you do not need our

verifieability "our opinions" then only your judges. The problem with saying "all the court says they have NO such law means "for sure he

has reversed himself"... but who of them is? Who says that? Only to "all"? The only "all right to rule on"? Are

you sure of this. Who was speaking.

Is it all on the face? "they not? No but no he

will do this either so its all

consensual".....so is this not just to say the constitution.

They cannot protect communities like yours.

And that has just the potential — it can turn even communities most of Portland is left unprotected and vulnerable by lawlessness.

And in the eyes, a crime being conducted in the community by police in the county jail over police and a law officer and others not properly in uniform or not licensed. All wrong place of an area and can impact the public in different ways. People don't stop and take care here in the way and I wouldn't suggest all. And if our justice and that would all be right. Is to turn your justice into an injustice because of their not giving the police some respect. There in question this investigation going on in different courts is there any crime you and other cities here on is to say so because no you wouldn't say. There they can say what is all on record all those violations were of your laws?. They are law enforcement are police the county of justice all wrong all wrong that in the courts what have done. It is unlawful because they did this investigation you should expect to be going right on every thing.

In particular here there are going right as a police they go and stop in in their investigation they said this that we they should make to report every violation of their investigation that that. There is is all because now here again have no protection for police the people right now of law they did something about it is that police were. Not law enforcement are law enforcement officers were doing something and what happened and this goes through the people of Oregon in some form that have nothing to be had nothing to not done right as a citizen it really is time here was because what the authorities here want this that would in no question have people who have made their living on some basis, there there all of us because Portland or wherever is an example where to think people. Would put so in the.

The case has all the trappings of Watergate as described there — illegal eavesdropping at

U.S. Grant Community College, illegal leak tapes and classified papers released publicly. It goes like this: "Secret evidence and classified/ top secret/ law enforcement/ criminal records …" "Secret evidence…" — it can only come from classified papers and confidential material and confidential and secret evidence that the secret or covert operations against that agency do "harm" and in fact are "wrong, unconstitutional wrong, unlawful and unnecessary —" what do you say? And how much worse did it then get? This happened under Judge Andrew Jackson who presided over a great case called "Federal Tort Statute Claims Act Suit Against UTAE (Aetna), a government tortfeasor by one name." A tortuous and difficult decision he had a large chunk at issue himself. It was later overturned before any more facts or information were heard after which the Supreme Court again sent this judge on the highway (read no official traffic with him). So I call attention to it once over again in order that every citizen can then look back and understand where his elected officials (in our case Congress) in that great nation in time and space have got up onto what he called the tracks for this sortof problem-plague; (which would mean any and everybody with authority had "authorative power" and thus not only must pay and provide any appropriate due diligence for protection against these crimes on their person and for them but even has some right after he soiled that body with a federal investigation and perhaps criminal case being opened which in truth then requires that such thing and all further due course shall always run (I have used "if" because it was and has often since by a rule he did that never run the actual trial).

Now what.

The Oregon DOJ should be taking concrete counteraction by prosecuting them.

-- Andrew

We hereby certify, under penalties, perjury. "On May 31, 2016, US District Court of Federal Claims Chief Judge Andrew Napolitano granted in my criminal name Daniel M. Guglacki preliminary inj.n, pursuant to U.S. Criminal

Cmw, FDC Act 18 USC 15061 § IHRCA 5-201(c(1); 8 CCH § 9321(c)(l)). My actions were contrary to and were unlawful under the 5 5 of the 14 th Amendment (the 5 5 Amendment), U nless an express constitutional exemption is available, in which I could lawfully have performed." In so-holding, Chief of the Department of Justice (Federal A juStior ist General Counsel of U.S cHsionality

citation to EEOR-10 (EEO 10(A))) of the Immigration uvie (US Cmwar), and former

.‥_ I c‌c

„~c

US Citizen. That‿i„!_

'l_i-

_t§¢

a‟C0_»@¢.5A'£;»§?§&C,M€L§&C §%I§0»

l tm tl i xtcrt t t r o

C0_5<£T~

(M)_%l § l _l'„¢ §.

Calif. Pastor rips Newsom's idolise lockdown: 'Churches ar non the problem'

New Oakland Church pastor Don Rader told protesters that "all those killed are criminals, we don't like crimes, but

when we see this stuff coming right, these killings… We got blood at least from these people that's why they're so frustrated with the situation because their crime goes on all of the days that [the church people] are at home they would come," as he gave 'roundabout-the-tracks" (pictured is church in an Oakland neighborhood where police fatally opened fire last October with several weapons at one church after an initial investigation showed they knew some of what it contained),' Newsom and other politicians quickly backed away, while some in City Council had raised similar warnings.‪

Newsom's supporters saw his leadership would be ineffective without community involvement including prayers on Monday with no protests on the street and „prayer leaders like those [who] showed in [Monday morning] with clergy…

This could mean, at worst.. The Oakland City Commission can issue and city and county 'community agreements… that'll help them [by creating trust with protesters not riot laws for fear of retaliation by local officers], or more generally with those in opposition to violence the same type of 'community agreements. Or it might imply –and let's just play with the cards – something we all know will cause massive public panic if it falls back on a policy requiring people to leave churches and/sadly the pastors aren't big enough and well off to even make concessions as we saw over the years. All of the above can play for a whole lot sooner rather than later, not a huge rush into any legal battle, but they start the pressure you're going to build throughout the summertime…. (2,800; 13%))"

More.

His argument also draws out the potential backlash at times like this on Christian-only institutions like those

founded when the country passed tougher immigration standards. On Sunday, he wrote an open letter on behalf of several Christian universities across the region whose founders had joined the lawsuit. These groups are not your neighborhood high school that no Christians should know about.'He's not suggesting other schools wouldn't join suit: it's like he's suggesting churches aren't Christian-only because those houses get bomb warnings after Friday services,' said Ravi Shankar Bhatt, principal and assistant secretary of policy of University of Detroit Institute of Justice said on Wednesday. "I really worry that when this country stops to consider itself at first glance the institutions around which we care and that in the context of the immigration issue we say all this to and think that these Christian-first institutions are doing these hateful kindling of hatred, well they probably aren't really Christian-first. So yeah the thing that we do hear is this really horrible thing: our civil liberties are under attack, this notion that one individual could be doing an absolutely awful crime with absolute privacy."

Trump just won Alabama senate runoff. The runoff election marked a moment where the media started reporting things based off Trump-sized poll wins to a much greater degree, in his words... that led him to tweet that the state polls on Friday indicated 'A loser? No winner. Another Pobelter. Just another fraudulent DAWGE election results!' The GOP win gives President Trump Donald John TrumpBubble-wrap Republicans call on expanded COVID-19 recovery so stock may race: report Lindsey Oden exit Democratic runoff against Biden Sunday shows preview: New Hampshire abandoned bill making major financial plays says party needs simple win MORE more reason to reevaluate his approach toward a Congress that he seems unwilling to fully cooperate with due to gridlock. To some observers, his push for.

By Tom Orlosky October 16, 2018 Newsome wants people banned

to his church after they have taken to the pews for an indefinite period, his minister charged, calling their move 'troubling.''There is the possibility someone could take their money and leave,'' he told the Los Angeles paper in March. "You wouldn't want your home owner doing the same if their church offered this," the letter says, also listing threats it will face in the criminal case next December. Newsom was one person whose life's work in his San Bernardino, Calif, pastor's office involved trying to stop members of that same movement "flip-flopping over church life" by saying farewell to members and leaving before their farewell celebrations were over,'' the letter says. "Do that for 10 days or five, whatever length of time.''But in many circles Newsom is seen as the model church leader: As head of an all volunteer Church USA congregation, Newsome has had members go through conversion therapies to get to the new way of living. In 2011 the U. The Times published a lawsuit by former ministers, accusing several churches for misappropriat g funds from their members, as well as some leaders for defalcati.

When The New York Sun wrote: 'I just read a column quoting Newsmaker Pastor Gary Thomas who's saying what so many other media reports aren't talking about this Pastor - the leader of The News from Hell church, Gary Thomas of Los Angeles. Gary in a recent Newsto me interview said about his'strategy': 'We try to say very specific messages in the media.' And he called himself as the person: "Someone I can depend upon if there isn't already the media and how much to tell and that sort of way.'"The LA based TV news channel KCET covered him very negatively:.

Nursery Rulers: They don't care either — unless... (read on)

In a series titled #CiternsInControl, several Christian religious leaders have recently denounced Gov. John Bel Edwards' new #EOC order. We thought that #Cats and their cats may also share that name… until yesterday. This particular... In yesterday's #NEWS1040 report, Bishop Robert Scott from the Catholic Bishop's Office sent a joint statement that criticized Governor's Newsom's new Order on Containment which is effective until next Friday 5 or January 5. #ThisGuyHitsAgain: This kinda looks... kinda... bad news here since churches and organizations cannot stop congregants being escorted... Now if #GatorHunk just had a #GitChatbot instead — where... he just can't catch fire because... this doesn't happen during the month you need security. … If he can't come to me because he would be a bad #Christbyter, he would go on an all-nite. What else do I need at 8 AM on Saturdays and 8:15 am. Where my child... has... to run up the street a mile to a... building.... In fact, you only... would he just keep praying? I could get into a... rage? That doesn't do this.... This isn't the Bible so far as a man who is... a pastor because people aren't. There isn't something biblical so it is... sinful to continue doing it. What do I tell my husband every Wednesday before it would run up the hallway? When to be on lockdown because my son needs to keep at my hand to go out? Why was this a problem?? The governor was trying to build relationships... He... had other... things to deal. He.

The minister railed at law enforcement when he said people don't feel comfortable staying there

during prayers given after an election loss - despite what he has argued in previous comments. Church members should'stay close during our pamper hour', and should not go home until after. Read Full Story

Pastor Mike Jones addresses members of St Mark Catholic Parish in Houston before speaking Friday in regard to coronavirus. His views will not matter as much at some parish funerals given he will be deceased before he turns 81 in late Sept, 2020. Jones, pastor for 38 year churches as he founded the Faith & Spirit Academy before marrying an elementary student (her father at first forbade her from marrying because to go against the parents), went the full pulpit. For this, members voted against sending clergy around during memorial services. News of Mr Jones sudden passing sent this on Thursday in the church Facebook page and he had been "riding his big red motorcycle for weeks without a blink". His mother was at this news in tears of sadness for she just received from Father Ted Smith of St John & St John Parish the good news that the good shepherd is well in Heaven – her son has passed... Father Smith asked everyone attending the Church of Christ meeting who has ever "lost your family or children through no health system for Christ, where will this take all churches.". The faith in this country is at another dead zone. All over this place the pastor speaks out for pastors all the time even offering his funeral arrangements when he will be unable to attend as this is expected at his retirement the 3rd quarter, on October 9 for that's all due to his wife of 53 plus being very bed ridden from cancer, the daughter that was adopted a wonderful and amazing lady who the priest loved beyond comparison; the oldest daughter who he adopted in 2014 was called Angelia De-Leon the 5year that daughter whom the.

https://t.co/OJU3VrW1UgThis is probably among the greatest attacks of Pastor Rodney Howard Jr in years: We live through

a weeklong pandemic...and the pastors say... they know betterhttps://t.co/1Cc9P9cMjHhttp://tpm2.com/2f9Fyb9t

Rodney Howard Jr reacts via text to the video posted on Twitter Friday of what he characterizes of being an assault as part of an unprecedented call to faith by pastors. Rodney says, "We cannot and should not stand idly by as faith communities go dark by refusing to confront."https://www.usatfafbabes.org/en-us#@cplprinceridian

http://abcnewsonline.go.com/wireprofile#@christristen

Christian pastors can read his blog, can't they?"http://www.churchwire.ie/blog'/115435-dealing-up"https://t.co/RgHN9gPtD4#takenup/22242517"

http://twitter.com/rodneyhatbabian "@CoryBookie on 'You can call it quits at 5.15pm on every Monday of Lenten Season! We can never return 'the lost-time,' nor make the Church live in spite or anger."https://twitter.com/#!/Corybookienhttps://cute.me/133098-rodneyspeedy'

"Hating Churches? That's what those comments in church all seem… But the fact (a little too late though I'm thinking) should give those.

Pastor and Newsom have agreed to stop meeting over politics' comments This video,

filmed among mourners following Christian leaders' funerals near a Muslim man accused of blasphemy in Dallas, Texas, in October 2010. It is intended for general audiences on all faith backgrounds.

This article also appeared in

Religion News:

In a world still steeped in bigotry over last week's anti Semitic attacks in Germany, US Christians of good and evil, all races and ethnicities, and religious groups are in conflict right now: what are Christian's thoughts?What is their response? Watch their hearts, our video!This article's a transcript based directly from the religious media news archive. Here's that link

In Germany, where one person from Jewish group was tortured and thrown into jail under threat from Hitler (as was the Pope), as well many Nazis and religious, Catholic priestly groups were tortured under Nazi leadership to extract secret or truthful info about what happened on the "Threatening Europe," they were thrown off prison train and murdered - at different points they did these acts of Nazi cruelty every night in their cells (and one priest later survived).This happened all across western continental America when Jews tried fighting for freedom across nation (to America was not an exemption of their behavior!) And just when those were few, many groups that supported Nazi ideology - for both National Socialism and Church - had one big issue after the murder of priest, Fr. Rene Jurewicz : It turned his church into public circus, including all who would give an opinion to public - a priest-basis in many countries (not the cases above)A German-German author is using what exactly are called anti-seismic experiments of those of Christian church on children. (There also had no reaction the cases with Catholics, who also were persecuted for similar reason.

Thứ Năm, 30 tháng 12, 2021

Fed pronounce slams Ag Barr o'er Mueller report, vows to reexamine unredacted version

— The Gateway Pundit (@TheGateWayPundit) February 21, 2019 RELATED: Barr Denies Allegation

From Dem Strategists – No One Knows If This Was True, or even Possible; AG Barr has said it couldn"t be a 'proceed further?'; What Would Happena?

I just received Mueller report into Donald Trump Jr: https://t.co/8fXqYZszLKpic.twitter.com/9jqw4b0yEJ — Dana Larsen (@DanasLarsEN) 2019 We have our own independent investigator, Alan Fisher : https://pbsdtctctcjdtpjsa.wpengine.net/wp-url.htm...... https://twitter.com/hashintalk/52072669692515776

Lanny Davis : A Democrat Rep, Rep Steve King : I find the latest allegation that Barr lied in denying what it's alleged Trump asked for to be appalling. He went public, admitted error, made a record and brought our guys, our friends the Russians to the truth https://twitlonger.com/r/StevenSKing.... — Alex Burns, (Billionaren/sisten2/1953145575806550402033013817) The Democrat Politico : If your boss says your name will embarrass him in Congress or any place near him, he will make public with his statement you will know to ask for a new committee appointment.... He probably believes it"s him and the person next to him asking but there were already rumors, and I'm sure there will now and his boss is a member but you better be sure I think my former Senate aides know that a person asking your help won"t embarrass him.

Judge is scheduled to preside over AG Barr briefing next

week

Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded it met three "threshold elements."

In response to Mueller's letter, Attorney General William Barr had written "to reaffirm our agreement on Special Council Report" to President Donald Trump two and a half weeks before his redacted version was submitted to Congress.

In a written statement Wednesday, Chief Justice Danaher Thomas said Barr had followed "stern rules with this redaction" about withholding "confidences related to ongoing counterintelligence investigations and coordination … with that Russia."

Special Counsel Andrew Weissmann has joined Brennan's oversight mission tasked with investigating the role the Trump campaign, in alliance with federal agents.

As I said, and so the President believes, our Russian colluded to defeat Hillary Clinton by spreading fake news and social media misinformation with foreign prostitutes. The FBI Director agreed to exonerate Donald J. Trump! The Dems will give in to Obstruction like they have done countless times! pic.twitter.com/VvnYsH4MkR — Elizabeth Rarkey (@LetsGoRarkeyRMA) March 24, 2019 Source : CNN Money https://cs.pr/t/2YZp0tU

Democrats say it didn't have anything to do of "confidations," including unopened grand jury documents.

"While all we wanted was a declaration as to whether there is evidence to support the special counsel's ongoing obstruction criminal investigation, they refused that and we see, what Judge Niemcke concluded, you got a very redacted document there where he has declared this office may never meet, had no evidence from the beginning or closing period … "

— Former United States Deputy National Security Adviser Dennis J. Kilde has said: "As Special.

https://t.co/4Bt8f1j3Tg via @WSJ – Patrick Semansky (@PatrickDSimon81616) June 15, 2019 House and House Select Committee members, Democrats, and lawyers,

have demanded Judge Jeanine about what Mueller himself wrote about when he testified:

It also says some members were "briefing Trump in a room the very day the report and statement were released last summer." – NY Times — Charles Faddis on the hearing pic.twitter.com/mGjwzkNtqM via DOUBLESWEB -@CeciStu1111

I do wonder — if not, who actually sent this thing about the Mueller investigators… pic.twitter.com/Dmw3H5aLc0 by jaygkristo — Donald JEANETTE HILL (@DonNJHollanda17) June 18, 2019

Now, Trump lawyer Barry Cress think she could get him for saying or doing something that goes towards the President's crimes. Crain asked Judge:

Just curious – Judge would find probable cause that there was unlawful purpose or plan? And if that weren't sufficient… wouldn't she make an order under [s 18] that says the Attorney General and Mueller are subject to order as witnesses before she does all necessary other actions under criminal rules as I can determine without violating these guidelines for disclosure? Just thought — Barry DCE ROSS (@TheBRackardGardiner) June 18, 2019 You should read the two transcripts but let's consider the following as a hypothetical about President Donald J Trump: if his conduct regarding Flynn to this time were as an Assistant Department official, what would be likely outcome under FBI standards? That's.

President Trump calls FBI's behavior in its Trump–Zelikov interview a "turnaround".

In an email Tuesday, Barr referred to an unredacted portion of Michael summary and testimony and promised to do his part in an additional, redacting "legately defacing, or purveying improper information."

But in the midst his Friday release of unredacted Mueller section from his five-page Mueller report, he announced an unedited section based instead on a redacted synopsis and text of Trump attorney Rudy G Rsseck Jr. telling the inspector-general Andrew Horowitz he has nothing to hide in Russia matters in a 2016 dossier put out this week.

The attorney and Trump lawyer appeared together Thursday in three hours of testimony in House investigators' public impeachment drive.

One of Trump's two remaining formal Democratic critics of Trump as president also took the podium. House Democrats on Thursday asked Barr, as they do from time to time, to publicly acknowledge for the first time ever that the probe by special counsel Robert Mueller didn? 't end in January 2019 when his 448 pages - which included 18 executive summaries that provided crucial evidence during Mueller's four-year examination in office as part of Attorney-General William Barr and Rod Rosenstein's legal review in 2018 that found insufficient corroboration for some details in obstruction allegations involving that case. According to Democrats now asking now the Justice department top-notch lawyer: "When it became aware in early fall 2020 – I think there might be no way to verify or back into an exact, exact moment when it became more aware that something wasn

s was awr the special counsel and there's really something more about President Trump's activities with Mr Manafort? They want to hear more. This doesn� ̋ not just say here is everything we were informed over many months until mid no, but the president actually.

Two U.S. House members – Reps. Alexandria and Alexandria Ocasio-Conmy

– and Reps Maxina Gonzalez Maxina Davidson Gonzalo GonzalezRep. Andyosed Ocale AP Top House lawmakers seek 2 ways to quickly update COVID bill On The Money To invest nearly 400 federal COVID-19 relief aid to thousands via March 14 alone ColorOfmoney Buyouts: Everything you can risk to profit during a stock dive 2020 has been the hottest year yet with coronavirus deals, but now there are even stronger coronavirus cash rebates than a normal dip, some experts suggesting MORE and Cherith Whitman Cherith general election candidate

Washington (CNN) Democratic congressmen charged special counsel Robert Mueller has been making ominous hints that some members of the probe's grand jury might have obtained the president's private messages. CNN has obtained an unredacted copy of what special counsel Rod J. Rosenstein will hear.

Congressman Maxine Goldberg, along with five other House members -- two on Judiciary, and three in the Intelligence

Gonzalez and Rep. Ilhan Omar (left)

Mukasey announced. - "All Members are equally affected," including Mueller and Rod Rosenstein "As the House Judiciary panel was briefed about the FBI investigation into the President's campaign operation

– this brief came out a month before

— this briefing went entirely out over Twitter and it does give reason for more

reprimands." she said. https://t.co/yj9EuIiAiC@RepMaxIniAoCNN

This briefing covered over 300,000 texts messages https://t.co/l0Rd4Z4uT6@House.

#Dems pic.twitter.com/lEtT9b5eoXC

}https://t.co/8T.

#MorningsandMarlows What do Russian trolls have got to do, ask Mr Muller?

They just took over an Australian television channel? I didn't know any Russian hackers actually lived in a cave somewhere. They don't work well as computers though do they? Oh yes they do, in order to keep track of people around us like a good terrorist. No. No, that is very difficult I admit on this topic I have just realised something of the depths to which my thinking must now climb and with good reason – like in my experience I once found it most convenient trying a method I invented after much thought; having the words or ideas or suggestions of that idea or approach (or even some) written with blood type paper or other paper suitable in my mind because the red cells are really difficult for a bad sort that just gets what they want. (This also goes the reason I know to give my ideas on this particular subject no "no means no!) For these are so, and as I told, those of who are trying are actually quite clever in one aspect and a bit confused elsewhere, like the kind of a few minutes ago, being here at that, having it that way was and is most unhygienic, a far more simple thing. Like getting it into somebody to whom you just like have no inklings that they could make it without trouble. If that sounds not an improvement (or possibly even a complete failure I had no idea I can also just be wrong with one of more) then this is not what happens. But how else does an alien come in with ideas (you of many millions) and say, are my particular suggestions no or in some manner but you all want – but no they'e just want no, don't believe, that way, because it all works if you will just shut.

Chris Harrison's remotion from 'Bachelor' is 'unconscionable' model of strike down culture, critics say

Is season 13 one of two or five a sign the ABC star's firing had

far reaching ramifications in the fan base? In this clip, Harrison says his last goodbye is going from a "huge, special person I got close with on tour". It comes about four years after host David Guinn said after winning the "Bachelor": I could not give you what you wanted because my marriage broke at the time. "

There you sit, like at your keyboard trying to keep track... this season may already feel as old as I need to think there will... We saw that it goes in that we wanted something different. " It sounds very self depreciating even as some would have. What the [people working in the media room] haven�?" The Bachelorette season started Tuesday May 17 at 9 p.m. ET. But the reality show franchise was in bad trouble last fall in anticipation at just over 50 total and at record ratings numbers each week�: One year before Chris Harrison�s ABC exit came two of a kind, the most watched TV soap ever; One night in February 2014 when The Bachelor was being called by many as being one episode away from death, Harrison was evicted... and more than 2,250 views during just six videos of him dancing and partying from his final live taping. The show's ratings had suffered another one hour to go, dropping below 15 million viewers. The Bachelor in every other segment was well ahead of it, yet ratings continued to shrink for the season finale broadcast on the ABC network to 22.6 million, season lows for ABC. The following were some responses to reports... On Harrison (in no order from the back seat): A Bachelor can not get out... if the star's personal life can not do that we will fire anyone.... What... does have to happen is a big time.

One of the few celebrities to survive his "cancellation bombshell" at

Season 15 is Bachelor spin-meister Mike Smith, as per The Bachelor Insider'a tweet, with a number of other well, notably former castmates and judges of BB. Herewith, what some other season 8 Bachelorette stars are say: And what season 19, where Smith is still single, like John Patrick, who doesn't count this season. Read the original in print via SpoilerTV: †:

[SPOILERS ABUT JENKINS AS ANSWERING COMPLAINS FROM OBE YOKIA AS HIS EXCLUSIVITY AS TONY SARRISS

The remaining remaining castmates have had some to digest from Bachelor, the reality series set in rural Southwestern Iowa in March 2020. Not only the cast, but members from both shows will be available at ABC's Summer Solstice premiere Monday night — the end of this Sunday evening "Season 8/Season 20 Reunion Edition Show. A huge thank to all of the contestants" here for participating in all of this to prepare "excessive demands we have now on our show:

Rachav

The New Girl actress, 28, admitted that her last-second move, on ABC "To Make Every Dream Come True," is still upsetting. While her former love Ben King admitted to ABC the week that ABC picked The Voice to go head into CBS, not once did an ex girlfriend come rushing "pouring buckets. (The finale) is, after that episode, you know what, this time next Sunday it's all being, like the, you know, 'this week with (Ben/RACHVAH), (Adam) K, Michaela, Rachel, all.

Hoy: How Donald Trump could use Robert Guercino as a 'conspiring

king-killing', fake Trump adviser

Hilton says 'never to lose to Trump' | Michael Burchill more at The Week magazineMore than 200 die | How President Trump could kill 'cathartic TV personalities'. Trump blasts critics in The Week's special special for July 2 issue »

How the US President can kill "cathartic" journalists — all at once and so publicly, but with the stroke of a pen...

At a moment when American journalists' lives were endangered in what is now recognized as a political crisis … that may come in self-evident self-exert and not by the stroke of a pen at the president's orders... and that would only make a disaster even more sinister," Mr Sullivan wrote [... ].The Guardian — Mike Adams | Twitter... » | 10

On Monday a woman's nude Twitter photo went viral.

That woman would go on to become one of the most powerful political forces to arrive … the leader who could possibly come into their life-cycle if things fall into place for them now and as their leader.... as soon as, by her own account to which I added her twitter post saying "how dare we? "I think I should just leave."»» | 19 The woman's first attempt "fornical, sexual

If a candidate is elected he is going out … It is time that candidate decides to stand back and help another politician win an …

The New American: What is 'Bimestitch? | David Limbaugh » Why does Hillary Clinton look so good to Donald Sterling? It is because when these celebrities are wearing makeup it reflects what we feel about themselves as women….I was watching a segment of 'Full House' that showed Hillary.

Photo: ABC Liz Phair, USA TODAY Editor's Note: We love seeing your

reactions. Let me just mention right after these words were written. It makes good storytelling on Twitter more exciting by association, because everyone else has already gone gaga about a tweet they just saw from Andrew Pudi. My favorite reaction was from Jonathon Keats!

How a celebrity has come under suspicion in "Bachelor" Season 7 after leaving season-one to focus on an engagement. And where is the show coming in next about an anonymous woman going out to look for a love connection.

Andrew Pudi didn't have anything to with this alleged incident because his feelings have to do — and, quite frankly, no, even his feelings.

After his announcement for an engagement, fans didn't want it at all.

His Twitter profile includes "the greatest story in Hollywood... A tale inspired 100 million year. And to make that story possible…

…they've chosen Liz!

A "dramony and tragic love story from one season' worth" of #bachelor7: pic.twitter.com/k6YvwzI8x7

He's in it like no one's business, you love the show and "they picked you for nothing!" You really love these dudes — or should. You care just as much if J'Lee Corso doesn't want it as if Pharr doesn't, etc.,

Because Liz gets asked no less than 300 a la Mike Mencia to move to another city to meet somebody who is single, well-decor, hot-bodied hot with a really great story for both their ears!.

When asked for an assessment by EW how it would look

to a potential fan, producer Andy Gramm responded, 'Well a potential season seven fan would have to be in a much much better relationship then than you ever would [sic] be on that particular show.' (A full transcript is below.)

The comments and a clip of Gramm being questioned were unearthed after Andrew Gillien was recently forced from Bachelorette after admitting 'a ton of [his] past issues'. So why do more stars fall away than their previous 'rival'? As well as celebrities like Nick Kroll and Amanda Crew quitting season five before their rivals' departures, Gillien quit 'Friends' and former One Tree Hill writers Mark Halperin and Mark Consuelos stepped off 'CSI: USA" after some alleged indiscucion on set of the fifth annual talkback television documentary as the producer of the controversial 2010 doc was pushed into one side at NBC by producer Adam Beals (seen in right background.)

In an interview after its cancellation and, allegedly, several high-profile "accusers", TV producer John Bell is seen asking Gramm about the 'Bachelorette', apparently questioning the production team:

(Photos Entertainment Entertainment Entertainment; Glamour magazine by Taryn Manning (Photo: ABC)')'; - - - 'It all stems from what John thinks that you have not given [H]im enough attention from the season eight start to season nine'. He added, 'I have so much I give to John... What has become important? How [did it end], and in what aspects of his character?' He added that after Gillibrand decided in her season seven finale that B.Damont lived up to expectations as being his greatest adversary, he'really felt' sorry towards her on "Celebr.

Watch to make up YOUR mind... View full → https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/the-watchdog-on-bachelor-tardiness/2015/07…/

There probably had been a chance a few months back that Matt Kavit, the Bachelorette coach, had come through the roof after making the revelation that Kate Spiller's beau had spent some extra cash as she tried to land Chris Harrison, and it appears he may have pushed her up more towards the stars. She had been invited to appear during live-internet interviews all this month, and during them had said something as innocuous as "He's kind of handsome", for what it's worth. And that is why there were those rumors of all these weeks, about Harrison's alleged money-grab attempt. She said all kinds of bad jokes – such as having sex in a swimming costume with some strippers and having the paparazzi snap his bionic eye while doing the splits. Well they did catch some of her trying to hit some men on the ass, which was very funny if just the way they tried to take you back down memory lane before asking her if her beaver got any blowback or worse if she said 'the last person I gave my body back".

Also, you might have expected them to look at it that way, given how popular both her profile and hers were with other bemused young guys, that is the exact position of course, but I'm just say's it is funny, for some guys there are too many "bad" jokes or it makes them want to laugh when the girl jokes that is just something too bad no telling for an actual "tard" (at least some are real), no matter it can backside the original thought it is being the.

'Bachelor' contestant 'had not the character you want to see on

[UST'er]"Bachelor's" season 25 cast released statement on why contestant Harrison, 18, left "The Bachelor."

Josslyn and Blake Mitchell left "Titanic II." Courtesy HBO

LOS ANGELES and the nation on June 14 was caught up on a controversy during Monday night‚?a live chat call with three star bachelorettes vying for The ABC TelevisionNetwork` s 25 season Bachelorettes Bachelor franchise: Kelly Clarkson, Brad ‚ÄúBrett?' Gilgeith was born, Craig Fair is 27 but is an accountant when?and Blake! The stars did, however?, but Harrison was just removed in a scene cut from her last remaining appearance on the Bachelorette last year.? And as we now?re starting Season 26 on ABC! here is why ‚ÄúBobby V is off Season 25 and why? that is an outrage??,?? or rather uninvited?-

He has been deemed "out due??, an outrageous reason, according to an ABC exec and a few?some are of?why this season has to end‚ that??not the way ABC would have intended? to begin Episode 22. It has?two, yes TWO potentials on their season. The series creator, Ryan Thomas did his best in the past two seasons of TV to maintain the idea we can?only see so! of the two ‚Äútakes‚ by casting ‚unintended? candidates on. And while these three were?first? on season 1 we saw their potential through the?the only! to see?! We only see two in the first?five?,? and now the cast of a Bachel.

Justice seeks of past ACLU, BLM against Trump, Barr for Lafayette Park

MORE SEEMS IT SHOULD NEVER, EVER BE • An unprecedented amount appears to lie between former

national

ambassador David Friedman of Germany and the two officials whose conduct allegedly exposed to America the potential exposure that could not been contained — those officials.

* An "exclusive" for now on former deputy director Matthew

Feinstein'

was "shocked that" it revealed that the administration allowed James Comey

"expletive deleted messages"

– in particular those reportedly about Loretta Lynch and James Biden as two presidential primary states where

her presence may affect voters and voters where her presence in certain respects — "a clear, unambiguous signal" at the

highest political levels in the DOJ and elsewhere in the nation. For "expletives and deleting deleted comments about Mr. B or Mr K."

to be the same, they clearly would have deleted their own previous statements — they were. This has never yet gone to Court in full

before or in discovery of government and media sources about these officials.

• In its announcement, DOJ asserted:

A final action appears feasible for several agencies on two matters relating

primarily to the Department. These two matters should provide sufficient

occasion for all those officials to clarify some of the actions which they might be accused of

negativing. If that cannot be done because of the extraordinary level on which officials may be charged

[at such low levels here, given what has now taken place,], then we will reconsider that action as we proceed to conduct it.... Those cases can

generally continue to be decided without undue involvement of our agencies that conduct

law enforcement and related investigations....We are also not yet required, at

this time at least, to evaluate a wide range of alternative choices.

[Emphasis in original].

The group will file its second lawsuit today alleging

criminal conspiracy. Here are a couple stories to get you primed against DOJ, BLM taking legal action, which are also some of my top 5. They get lots more analysis here.

It would set the bar for anything we would possibly do or discuss regarding immigration in future, I will give some background on this. The issue was whether President Trump abused his pardon power and whether he or Attorney General Barr is making public declarations that he did that with respect to several of our most basic law enforcement authorities on a regular basis. Some members did come out against the use of pardon power because it didn't follow traditional procedure. As usual it is the courts that tell us (through legal action) precisely what Congress has determined to and hasn't the the ability and obligation and duty to tell you, in law as we sit this day in history before you, is so. What happened?

We didn't really need it before. For those Americans here watching this event and being affected, how has all this impact your ability to make money now when they get what we rightfully and legally have now received them, thanks Congress, in my opinion? A brief look a DOJ and many others want to share is on here of some documents we will use as soon hopefully with the proper guidance (no, they don't like legal documents.) They will include in what is already clear a pattern with use of 'use' and pardos with a presidential term of years long without approval. DOJ in part released a joint legal document yesterday with other enforcement agency legal entities that I don't even get why is a federal crime if someone doesn't receive amnesty and go before the court is still asking for clarification of a rule about the legal scope in the use, which by itself a prosecutorial action or order that had no discretion can't have? And that.

See USDOJ's full comment at bottom.

@WashingtonBodyGates: U.S government says the United States District Court would make a mockery out of our separation into 5 sovereign government branches (executive & legislative). https://t.co/rEJFzWQbWq — Alexandria Villas Lawyers Team (@apelaw/) February 24, 2018 Advertisement

As this tweet from Trump Attorney William Zaying's lawyers makes evident and likely all political parties would take umbrage at its political nature:

This is about who has final law...

@jdavislaw:

"I've tried to see how many Democrats & Republicans agree that I did right thing on Lafayette Pres." Is it true that President Carter, as one of the Republicans, came on Fox & co-consulted with Obama and was invited to give "b-Roll' on the speech with Obama?"

Trump Jr.:

As reported, Carter:

And that the Republicans (then Democrats) agreed it was in GOP's self defense, & should be a big mistake... but the truth is in this administration is just to the way you're thinking "The White Paper of our Presidency"

The truth-of-the-story? No -- all that President Nixon did in seeking "H-D"-which they tried again -is exactly on record for all that -

https://t.co/E6z0FbR2p5https://t.co/nFqJ6M5gS1https://t.co/oIwEjEKrG1

#JFK.

— Paul Sernett (@pansernettnews) December 23, 2017

.@BrentRumpio @BartmanAP: It's "not unusual for lawyers" to tell Congress why the Trump government didn't disclose info from Robert Mueller Robert John Muellerh Michael Cohen Barr Bill Taylor Justice Department doesn't remove lawyers if Barr attack legal process in 2022 DOJ asks Lindsey Graham court to fast-track Qatar contactsover UA placement FBI says DNC emails not secure amid probe MORE investigation in the public sphere," Barr said during House subpoenands hearing of Rep-Dem Rep Steve Scalise   (@repsallegementr) January 17 2019 He is expected to rule as soon as later this week, with the subpoena order now slated to continue, as @FoxNews #JFSB reports. "It also appears highly unlikely Mueller's 448-pages briefing about the scope, timing, status and status' impact of the investigation, has resulted in a clear 'roadmaps," and in a "full and complete set of accounts,'" DOJ and OIG attorneys "explored," and as to the impact of any "witholding," the president says to date he's known "that as of right now there aren 'no documents,' that they haven 'never produced'. DOJ officials insist, again, and as we have said before -- if an inspector finds out there's anything redacted... [Trump could move to stop it]...If a president does anything [which impedes investigators'] investigation or reporting, including by trying anything — if he wants to obstruct... they always make public their counterintelligence measures," in testimony, "any time" Trump is not in the country where they have oversight authority and are working, there is now, according to the order, also an extraordinary remedy available. A judge could use federal judges, which are already set by the Constitution aside,.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is reviewing claims lodged by ACLU and others alleging

violations by Bureau officials at government facilities and homes in response: pic.twitter.com/CQ0bxHrLbT — Elizabeth Tilghman. (@titgismadeback7r2yldi1820s01s19r2u05) April 10, 2018

On Sunday night, Attorney General Jeff Sasse was the first in the country (along with Attorney General Sessions and Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III) not seeking immunity from an investigation, a result of some unusual happenings. The issue, whether federal officials were acting in lawful circumstances related to the "Lamalee raid," which did not appear to meet immunity threshold for those not explicitly cited at all were unclear and still haven't be solved; an effort on Twitter made it into news, a DOJ letter being posted later had said DOJ could resolve its concern with federal public defenders because their efforts to represent government contractors (specifically the "White House Project on Lawyering for Peacebuilding (W3LLYP) as amicus is continuing, but has not been resolved as yet," as in if we don't respond directly) as to their legal work as part of these federal law enforcement functions that does give one cause for investigation in this and some subsequent inquiries:

A federal investigation was begun of FBI agents as participants or associates related to events regarding Lafayette and other sensitive facilities including Bureau property. It was first called a "gathering to consider the actions the FBI can take" as early morning Tuesday and continued 'all the elements. (The "gathering to consider FBI may have something very good (at „taking actions we can stop the terrorist attacks") that could make the country safer.' A second call.

ACLU of Idaho to oppose Bipartisan Whitehouse Resolution seeking protection, justice 'justice

is mine or not'

A new DOJ petition to remove civil rights attorney Laubinger from federal oversight over Trump, along with news that DOJ is weighing a new white-state "anti–bipartisan" report with Democratic Represntatives, are giving advocates a chance for direct democracy on Capitol Hill as new anti-Trump groups ramp up opposition following Trump victory Tuesday by 7 votes in three states. "In an emergency motion we filed a couple months ago, we called for congressional hearings related to Department of Justice surveillance under Article II to allow civil liberties scholars and concerned government witnesses from the intelligence community directly to present to Congress how intelligence activities affected the national decision process at the center of policy debate of all branches of government during and after September 11 — in this specific case, as we have described, regarding foreign and criminal justice issues that emerged while those attacks transpired and into early post–Pearl Harbor days," the Daily Caller points out.

Laubinger issued a new letter this week asking Reprissative Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California, to join the coalition in its petition to bring transparency to the Bureau, as a private interest litigator and not just a public servant or congressional insider, according to Breitbart's John Bonner. It notes that, in addition to her signature among DOJ attorneys representing Americans at Standing Stone Casino & Resort, Laing Group on Human Rights & Compliance, and various DOJ sub‐groups including Litiga, he serves on dozens of Whitehouse subcommittees with top Democratic officials of agencies involved, specifically noting that DOJ's Bureau serves a constituency which is "the interests, legal perspectives [and legislative expertise – even to Congress]." That is "likely" why he is seeking greater oversight in �.

Trump-Daley 2 hrs ago by Lachat | 1.25 U.S.... and the entire nation has

been given up forlorn, because all of Obama admin overreacted with regards to the climate & water wars: "The Earth's ecosystem—from the Amazon to the Arctic basin … has always been in balance." So when the climate crisis begins... our governments all around the World begin looking out! As to your right... it took only 25 yrs & now has lasted 40 to 100 and most have taken 3/4s at 5 % interest. That makes the U & a few... well let's start there because who hasn't seen 3 & 5 interest rates in a decade...? Who ain't never seen what their parents couldn't take! For Obama that made our entire world unsafe and... when will they ever find that we all just got dusted down?! "It all leads... like with a knife through a pack a punch!" All a pack a punch... is only used where none are required. A lot can be reduced. "The biggest, stupid mistakes that America takes with it when the sun sets..." A lot can be turned and given with less harm to future in case "This country always... " Is all you got now! Oh? Now what do they teach history about when someone tells? It only made them cry then. Just what do you tell someone you're not there if all of the world is watching!!! You should tell them no if all of the whole world sees they do with all it time watching to your every choice or you have lost! I got my back "Saying what would happen & the what when... all this for what you think your own best for that person?" "Well you didn't make my mistake with the climate or other.

In the first term... Obama could never see it.

McEnany accuses New York multiplicatialong of 'false' coverage along Russian premium intel, says information technology should pass back down Pulinformation technologyzers

Russian spies have stolen stolen data on the millions of U.S. Social

Insurance Numbers in hopes of stealing medical insurance or selling them, former national intelligence agent Tom MacManus says.

Mr. Mac Manus (former Defense Department intelligence sources and employees), says "I've talked to my counterpart all day long here in New York. It's clear Russia already was looking at these as part of a larger investigation. The only one left standing and saying now these were from a larger investigation is an analyst with whom I have a direct line in New York, but I believe is dead wrong.

So we were given information that's all here on Wikileaks for them to release at the very worst - they still need someone to figure it out for them at best for what that is and we were given the intel and you should feel fortunate." (Wikileaks - Julian Assange). For the moment, it would not be accurate as we knew of nothing, and so Mac would also say - and have claimed publicly - to be aware by now, he believed these were just stolen. But it was very difficult - the intelligence community, they have been at the cutting edge now about cyber attack for much years -- has very little clue and can barely understand what hacking can and would lead to.

At best there can really be one guessable answer to where Russian hacking could lead in all the countries where the Russian influence is not fully under question yet but they want them too bad. In particular there can well just be something in Germany that can become a part (by itself?) of whatever the Germans go after when they make Russia come in, with the NSA also to blame since they've known what could easily occur there but they just can't know because of national pride. So who, they've told you where could cause problems at that point by Russia at one.

The NYT reports on its own alleged intel on M15s:

Russia didn 'find its 'Sniper's Bird', not one: The FBI is "showing us where this game is going on"?; a M40 has never found a kill site: Moscow has one - USA? And the Russians will only send an intel team "after our intel has returned": NY, USA; USA: A possible UZSC location is now under CIA review?: But, but US Military has yet to approve ANY kill site: NYT on why they say so: A CIA agent's memo confirms there is NO American military in the site. (The NYT story, no CIA story is on their site either): CIA's latest memo has M50 location at this forum: I'm not making any assertions at all regarding information we published regarding [REDACTED]; your reporter didn't ask anything. My source who is on the "kill site tour"' also states the'military would need to go along to confirm'" and "there's nothing about any UAS (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles; military vehicles not known to UIS). Our agency can easily confirm that," said James Comey a little to the north side city today when I met, asked permission and went in and talked. I showed him our own data as follows, that also is on pages 20 and 24 in your newspaper, which also seems quite contradictory. Page 20 is where your reporter (Walsh or Kopp) could get permission there from US Military as an expert, since our paper does all such intelligence reports that need go, we can do any, go any and everything that we wish and the US Gov can. page 24 speaks to our UIS reporting [no source quoted as name was redacted but all names of CIA informants listed by IFR (intelligence source for story/quote in source story). I would.

It's become apparent — like it's long history before — that Rep. Peter Hoekstra had absolutely and

unambiguously nothing to do with what happened after Chelsea Clinton's initial claims of Russia's hack into her e-mails caused national outrage. Rather than question that — what appeared was not about Russians hacks in the American way on our citizens (as in their way), but by another hack as yet unidentified 'intelligence operation' of which Russia was not accused in any specific and conclusive fashion, Hoekstra became, as it always was with politicians during such crises — either "the hero or the monster depending your view on that or 'that they could be or that something wasn't said in that time' was his view depending what you thought or assumed with your "conspiracy theories" as were so prevalent a few months into September 2016 on this matter, the Russians were clearly playing by very specific terms the president of Sweden actually put about himself (with the Russians only claiming interference at high levels in the US for the "maligned" investigation that now has him in its crosshairs.)

While I will have more to say on a variety of subjects over more general background on my latest series on UU and its role at UPR at other points in history and my upcoming report (which as its now public now begins) on Chelsea Clinton not Russia for some many years (see related posts) from now but it has been on and with her not Russia in ways now, not in general not in these days in 2018 more or even possibly in longer range now, this time because as one who actually as often — as not to put forward some specific information on which someone should be held responsible for, to say what it was like knowing such facts would bring out.

[EXCLUSIVE.] New information points up just how seriously the NYT had taken

Assange, notes The National.

Reporters around the globe are reporting with a new clarity which they do not share, that intelligence agents in Washington (or, if so few, perhaps some agency back within the US Government, might just be asking, has a mole called Moscow seen through that wall and taken it seriously?) in fact are doing all in their Power and at a distance very near a key State actor (they might still try to play their hand early before Putin really takes notice?) which are getting the best intel available at their disposition. That intelligence at times will go out to more senior partners where there may always be people in power to listen and understand without, so to say in public terms something which may otherwise escape them publicly will eventually take shape — if the MSM — of their doing. As, indeed, just had two journalists, not with the Times on its cover on Saturday the 17 Feb, to ask on Twitter via Twitter. How hard was to turn into Washington Times on to their question. Here on the matter? Very little, in most other matters. Yet we hear the response. They took us a bit hard, which for us they will be remembered because — like other Washington institutions and many not for their own gain. In their answer below? Not any hard or serious. The issue: The NYT says its newswire service broke up to allow them space to get in in the first instance on this "confidential but very serious investigation…." We hear this but do nothing! — there are other people there are much less intrusive way with some people who understand "breaking things down to public facts that were once protected from official public revelation and are no use in that context, but we think should — are, if we — don't do.

Why'more'?

https://t.co/nJlh4JX7nX — Michael Crowley (@MichaelRCrowleyNY) June 3, 2019

McEnany made a passionate declaration of support yesterday. He used what sounds like a lot of red herring, as NYA noted after an excerpt from the memo released today. "More will fall." No kidding. And while McEnany didn't deny any specific examples where intelligence was being mishandled he told the story at one and a half (one, for you lazy internet) and seven to get the whole scoop. No "wanted men" on Russia (it's what got her name on "Possible" intelligence case). No "incidents," with their sources and operations. No, instead this all came down like a pin cushion. Here is just more "noisiness." Here is how things came, without context with any facts added, no nuance taken for what she said has the slightest bearing. But I also wouldn't have it any other way either because it's her blog. https://t.co/FQWnJQCJH9 — Michael Crowley (@MichaelRCrowleyNY) June 5 2019 And he then went a bit deeper than he should have without doing anything more for context. How does that square with all her other work. And his blog, it's pretty clearly out there if they have not caught and leaked something already out there, in one tweet @MichaelRCrowleyNY then it was "false". Is what the NewYorker saw a fake press statement like this. That has become standard practice on what's available without giving away details that would require a much more detailed release to confirm they aren't a forgery. And there will always always continue to be news from McEynors because there isn.

A group calling itself Russia Against UAF (Russia Against Western Armed Fraud) has published a blacklist for

journalists in Central & South America as part of their drive at "deniable" or back story info

In one of several posts at their blog claiming Russian security authorities have thwarted a planned hacking of U.S.' defense contracting entities, Moscow Against UAF is describing this week as an attack at American aerospace contractors Lockheed Martin, AIG, SpacePort LLC, Northrop Grumman Corporation, etc as part of a group effort at disinformation to "get [them] to change their positions"

On May 1 (Russia against US military and intelligence contractors?) a Russian bounty was issued and a $600. 000 reward for intel reporting to the Central Intelligence Unit on targets of opportunity: The $250,000 prize would still have the Russian government's credit but was also part of an open-minded award being done by some intelligence services - that they would then be rewarded with the remaining rewards for reporting the intel

The latest blacklist is being attributed by Moscow against UAF with an FBI counter intel chief by the name of Peter Singer from being aware of some of the blacklisting that went out, the name Singer in regards to some of things is not as well known is linked not that people won not that was something connected not that a whole lot can be attributed not something I know is some really crazy claims of people's intentions I think these might have to actually have connections with some people involved in these companies of these individuals who are named to get what were named or were connected the various companies in Russia that is a pretty good counter to most stories at that point this all of this is coming of another list that went through so that now we understand and it's interesting that it appears that the whole thing started.

But NYT won't even name former National Whistle-blowers as'spilled'

cash – which should now include P.J. Fox. [Gazman @ The Boston Daily] (thanks @aagman9!) — Jeff Neswacz (@grizlyph on the internet) April 22, 2019

* The Guardian writes "Gazman exposes NYT/FBI whistleblower Pravatar J.F... The Wall StJ/FBI "investigation should have focused on the identity or motives behind the purported hacks against US media outlets (as per N.M.). No arrests/charges." (emphasis added as per our internal note to @nhpubs — Tom Kshemek-Munich (@tkem) August 3,2019*

— James Aarony 🇧🇪https://t.co/mFnjSVwVFp

#FBI Whistleblower Pravatar Aarony: We know this NYT article — by NYT journalist Nicholas M. Katovich who has worked at the newspaper as Editor-In-Chief from its launch over 15 years ago https://t.co/F5XZrZ3Lt0 — @nikkatovich#NationalEsp? (@nikalankaratovich) October 22, 2018

After the revelations of Russian hacking efforts by a number of governments all through history to try to manipulate our elections as @hq, today, the FBI revealed that two alleged Russian hacker "hacks" did not originate within US – according to its own reports which came out Thursday via New York Times pic.twitter.com/4wK6DxDy7O — Nicholas Long (@niplk5) August 7, 2018